Modern Hebrew verb conjugation

src: www.biblical-hebrew-study.com

In Hebrew, verbs, which take the form of derived stems, are conjugated to reflect their tense and mood, as well as to agree with their subjects in gender, number, and person. Each verb has an inherent voice, though a verb in one voice typically has counterparts in other voices. This article deals mostly with Modern Hebrew, but to some extent, the information shown here applies to Biblical Hebrew as well.

Video Modern Hebrew verb conjugation

Classification of roots

Verbs in Hebrew, like nouns, adjectives, and adverbs are formed and declined by altering a (usually) three letter root. However, the root can be identified as having a different pattern than normal in certain cases.

A root that contains at least one of the "weak" letters ?? alef, ?? hey, ? vav, ?? het, ?? yod, ?? nun, and ?? 'ayin or two of the same consonant (geminates) is called a weak root. Each pairing of a weak letter with a position results in a slightly different conjugation pattern. Resh ? is often considered a weak letter, though it occasionally functions as a strong letter, depending on speaker and era of the language. Roots without weak letters are called strong roots, among other names.

A root that contains ?? het, ?? hey (except in third position without mappiq), or ?? 'ayin or ?? alef (in first position only) is a guttural root. The pattern changes from this group are largely due to all of these letters being unable to take schwa nah. Alef outside of first position is in its own group due to the vowel changes that accompany it being drastically different than other guttural roots. A root that contains ?? hey word-finally without mappiq is also similarly divergent from guttural roots, due to being a marker of vowel-final words rather than any historical consonant.

A root that contains a ?? vav or a ?? yod as the first or second letter is called a hollow root, as the simple (pa'al and nif'al) conjugation function as two-letter roots, while the other conjugations keep the letters somewhat due to the middle root being geminated. A root beginning with yod usually marks a waw-initial root (due to Old Hebrew /w/ becoming /j/ at the beginning of words), but occasionally functions as if it a regular yod root.

A root containing ?? nun is irregular due to the fact it will form geminated consonants rather than clusters of it. Roots containing two of the same consonant as the second and third part of the root function similarly.

Roots of four or more letters treat the middle letters as a permanent cluster and don't have forms in the simple conjugations pa'al and nif'al, but are regular otherwise.

There are also entirely irregular verbs like ????? ("to be"), and ?????? ("to walk"), which are unusual beyond their bearing of weak letters.

Maps Modern Hebrew verb conjugation

Binyanim or conjugations

Hebrew verbs are conjugated according to specific patterns, derived stems, called ??????????? (/binja'nim/ - binyanim, "constructions") where vowels patterns and affixes are slotted into the (usually) three-letter ????? (/?o?a'?im/ - shorashim, "roots") from which the majority of Hebrew words are built.

There are seven basic conjugations and a very rare eighth hitpu?al, as well as some irregular verbs technically pa'al, nif'al or pi'el being used irregularly without necessarily a weak root (due to being descendants of obsolete conjugation or confluence between multiple conjugations). The traditional demonstration root is ?.?.??, which has the basic meaning of "action" or "doing":

This simplified chart's menorah-like shape is sometimes invoked in teaching the binyanim to help students remember the main ideas about the binyanim: (1) which binyanim are active voice (left side) vs. passive voice (right side), and (2) which binyanim are simple (outer-most menorah branches), intensive (second-outer-most), causative (third-outer-most), and reflexive (center). Note that some binyanim have more than one meaning.

Examples:

• In Hebrew (and in Arabic), many words that have a meaning related to writing contain the root K-T-B. (In Hebrew, due to a process called begadkefat, when the letter B does not come at the beginning of a word, it may sound like a V. The same thing happens with K and ?.) Thus:
  • "he wrote" (simple active voice) is ?????? "ka'tav", while "it was written" (simple passive voice) is ???????? "ni?'tav"
  • "he dictated" (causative active v.) is ????????? "hi?'tiv", while "it was dictated" (causative passive v.) is ???????? "hu?'tav"
  • ??????? "ki't:ev" and ??????? "ku't:av" have a few meanings, none of which is commonly used, while "he corresponded" (intensive-reflexive) is ??????????? "hitka't:ev"
  • "he rewrote" is ????????? "?i?'tev", while "it was rewritten" is ????????? "?u?'tav" (though these two rare binyanim are used only with a few roots and thus are omitted from most of the discussion within this article).
• In Hebrew, many words that have a meaning related to clothing contain the root ???? L-B-SH (in Arabic, ??? L-B-S). When this root is put through the seven common binyanim, it changes its meaning similarly to the way the root ???? K-T-B does, but with a small difference. Here, the intensive reflexive form, ??????????? "hitla'b:esh", does not connote reciprocity as with "he corresponded", so the meaning is "he dressed himself", not "he dressed the person who dressed him".
• The root ???? G-D-L is common to words related to growth. Thus:
  • "he grew up" (simple act, either active or passive) is ?????? "ga'dal"; the nif'?al binyan is not used with this root
  • "he enlarged" is ????????? "hig'dil", while "it was enlarged" is ???????? "hug'dal"
  • "he grew apples" (intensive, active) is ??????? ??????????? "gi'd:el tap:u?im", while "the apples were grown" (intensive, passive) is ????????? ????????????? "gud:?'lu hat:ap:u?im ", and the intensive-reflexive form of this root (??????????? "hitga'd:el") is used almost exclusively in Jewish Babylonian Aramaic prayers.

As mentioned, some binyanim have more than one meaning. For example, ???????? hif'?il's second most common meaning is "become". Verbs like "became fat" (????????? "hi?'min") and "turned pale" (???????? "he?'vir") are in this binyan. This meaning of ???????? hif'?il is similar to that of the Arabic ninth derived stem, ????? if?alla, while ???????? hif'?il's main meaning is shared with its Arabic historical equivalent, the fourth derived stem, ???? af?ala.

src: i.ytimg.com

Present Tense (Present Participle)

A verb in the present tense (???????, ho've) agrees with its subject in gender (masculine or feminine) and number (singular or plural), so each verb has four present-tense forms:

The present tense does not inflect by first, second, or third person because its use as a present tense is a relatively recent trend, as this form was originally used only as the participle. The modern present tense verb is still used as the present participle; see below.

The ancient language did not have strictly defined past, present, or future tenses, but merely perfective and imperfective aspects, with past, present, or future connotation depending on context. Later the perfective and imperfective aspects were explicitly refashioned as the past and future tenses respectively, with the participle standing in as the present tense. (This also happened to the Aramaic language around the same time, but did not happen in Arabic, where the present and future tenses still share the same morphology, the one equivalent to the Hebrew future tense. The future tense is distinguished from the present tense by the use of prefixes.)

src: i2.wp.com

Past Tense (Past/ Perfect)

A verb in the past tense (?????? ?a'var) agrees with its subject in person (first, second, or third) and number, and in the second-person singular and plural and third-person singular, gender.

Note that the past/perfect and the present/participle inflections of the third-person singular nif'al were historically pronounced with different vowels in the final syllable--the past/perfect with a pa'ta? ( ??  = /?:/), and the present/participle with a qa'mats ?a'dol ( ??  = /?:/). In Modern Hebrew, both of these vowels have merged to /a/, and the two verb forms now are pronounced the same. For example, the past tense ????????? ni?'mar means "he was guarded" (or in old-fashioned perfective "he is/was guarded"), whereas the present tense ????????? ni?'mar means "he is being guarded".

src: i.ytimg.com

Future Tense (Unpast/ Imperfect)

A verb in the future tense (??????? ?a'tid) agrees with its subject in person and number, and in the second- and third-person singular, gender. The second-person singular masculine and third-person singular feminine forms are identical for all verbs in the future tense. Historically, there have been separate feminine forms for the second- and third-person plural (shown in parentheses on the table). These are still occasionally used today (most often in formal settings), and could be seen as the 'correct' forms. However, in everyday speech, most Israelis use the historically male form for both genders.

As in the past tense, personal pronouns are not strictly necessary in the future tense, as the verb forms are sufficient to identify the subject, but they are frequently used.

src: www.hebrew-verbs.co.il

Imperative

Except for the strictly passive binyaním (pu'?al and huf'?al), each binyan has distinct imperative forms in the second person. This imperative form is only used for affirmative commands. The pa'al, nif'al, pi'el and hif'il form their imperatives by dropping the initial ? taw of the future-tense form (e.g., ?????????? /tif'ta?/ (singular, masc.) -> ??????? /'p?ta?/ "open!", ???????????? /ti?m?'ri/ (singular, fem.) -> ????????? /?im'ri/ "guard!"); the fifth, hitpa'el, forms its imperative by replacing this initial ?? with ?? (/titba't:el/ -> /hitba't:el/ "do nothing!"). (Note that the dropping of the initial ? often results in a change in vocalization, as can be seen in the instance of /ti?m?'ri/ vs. /?im'ri/).

Negative commands use the particle ???? /'al/ followed by the future-tense form. For example, ??? ????????? /'al tid'a?/ means "don't worry" (masculine, singular).

In informal speech, the future tense is commonly used for affirmative commands when making requests. Thus for example, ?????????? /tif'ta?/ can mean either "you will open" or "would you open" (masculine, singular). (Similarly in English one might say "would you open" or "could you open" in lieu of simply "open".) In Hebrew, as in English, the more formal way to avoid the implication of commanding is to use the word "please" (????????????? /b?-vaq:a?a/) with the imperative.

The infinitive can be used as a "general imperative" when addressing nobody in particular (e.g., on signs, or when giving general instructions to children or large groups), so that for example, ??? ??? ?????????? /'na 'lo lif'toa?/ means "please do not open". This might be more literally rendered as "it is requested that [this] not be opened", avoiding the question of address by using a passive voice.

src: i.ytimg.com

Participles

Present participles are identical to present tense forms (the modern present tense actually having been derived from the ancient present participle): ?????? ??????????? /ne'rot bo?a'rim/ (burning candles), ???????? ??????????? /jal'da maqsi'ma/ (charming girl).

Only the pa'al binyan has a true past participle: from ???? k-t-b we have ???????? /ka'tuv/, (writ, written). For verbs that have a pa'al form and a nif'al form serving as its passive, this provides a means to distinguish between a completed and a continuing action. The pa'al past participle indicates completion:

• ??????????? ??????????? /has:?fa'rim k?tu'vim/ (the books are written)

while the present tense of nif'al indicates that the action continues:

• ??????????? ???????????? /has:?fa'rim nixta'vim/ (the books are being written)

The passive participle is commonly used as an adjective, as in ??????????? ???????????? /hap:?qu'd:a hak:?tu'va/ (the written order).

The present tense of the pu'al and huf'al are used as passive participles for the pi'el and hif'il respectively. For example, from hif'il ??????? /he'?ir/ (lit) we get ????? ??????? /'?eder mu'?ar/ (lit room).

src: i.ytimg.com

Infinitives (Prospectives)

Infinitives (??'mot hap:o'?al) in Hebrew are primarily formed by adding the letter lamed (?) to the front of the base form (tsu'rat ham:a'qor). The vowels change systematically according to the binyan.

• ??????? /ka'tav/ (wrote, pa?al) -> ????????? /lix'tov/ (to write)
• ????????? /m?da'b:er/ (speak, pi?el) -> ????????? /l?da'b:er/ (to speak)
• ????????? /hit'?il/ (started, hif?il) -> ??????????? /l?hat'?il/ (to start)
• ???????????? /hitpa'lel/ (prayed, hitpa?el) -> ?????????????? /l?hitpa'l:el/ (to pray)
• ????????? /nif'?a?/ (met with, nif?al) -> ???????????? /l?hip:a'?e?/ (to meet with)

Note that pu?al and huf?al verbs do not have infinitives.

src: i.ytimg.com

Gerunds

Gerunds (??'mot p??u'la) are nouns expressing an action. Gerunds are created in Hebrew by putting the root of a verb into a mi?'kal, a noun pattern (see Modern Hebrew grammar#Noun derivation). Five of the binyanim have gerunds: pa?al, pi?el, hif?il, hitpa?el, and nif?al. For example:

• ??????? /?a'mar/ (guarded -- pa'?al) -> ?????????? /??mi'ra/ (guarding, a watch)
  • ????? /'?av/ (returned -- hollow pa?al) -> ???????? /?i'va/ (returning, a return)
  • ??????? /?a'ta/ (drank -- final hey pa?al) -> ?????????? /??ti'j:a/ (drinking, a drink)
• ???????? /nix'nas/ (enter -- nif?al) -> ???????????? /hik:an'sut/ (entering, an entrance)
• ???????? /bi'q:e?/ (visited -- pi?el) -> ????????? /bi'q:ur/ (visiting, a visit)
• ??????????? /hif'tia?/ (surprised -- hif?il) -> ?????????? /hafta'?a/ (surprising, a surprise)
• ??????????? /hit?a'm:em/ (warmed -- hitpa?el) -> ?????????????? /hit?am:?'mut/ (warming)

Note that unlike in English (where gerunds and present participles share the same form but different etymology), Hebrew gerunds cannot be used as adjectives.

src: i.ytimg.com

Conditional

Modern Hebrew has an analytic conditional~past-habitual mood expressed with the auxiliary /ha'ja/:

src: i.ytimg.com

See also

• Hebrew grammar
• Prefixes and suffixes in Hebrew
• Waw-consecutive

src: i.ytimg.com

Bibliography

• Academy Decisions: Grammar, chapter 3, for the Academy of the Hebrew Language's decisions on the conjugations of less common verb patterns
•  Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, §38 ff.
• Ornan, Uzzi (2003). The Final Word: Mechanism for Hebrew Word Generation (in Hebrew). Haifa University. 

src: i.ytimg.com

External links

• Hebrew Verbs Conjugation Tool - Online Hebrew Verb Learning Tool (Hebrew/English)
• hspell - ?????? ????? ?????? - ???? ????? ????? - Online Hebrew verb conjugator, based on hspell, the Free Hebrew spelling engine (in Ktiv male)

Source of the article : Wikipedia